[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: HAVE_GETHOSTBYNAME2 does not imply HAVE_IPV6! (patches)
"Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Heimdal's code, unfortunately, assumes that having gethostbyname2()
> automatically means IPV6 is supported.
Yeah, that's broken. Thanks for your patches.
> Diffs are against 0.0t, but I've applied them to 0.0u without problems. If
> any more of these are in 0.0u, you'll hear about it shortly....
Applied. And those were all the cases of gethostbyname2 I could find