[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [michaels@inet.no: Re: gss_accept_sec_context() problem]

Michael Shuldman <michaels@inet.no> writes:

> I can't see any requirement for input_token to be filled when
> calling gss_accept_sec_context() and was expecting

No, but I also can't see anything that says you can pass something
that didn't come from the remote client. From RFC2744:

   input_token_buffer   buffer, opaque, read token obtained from remote

Why do you want to pass an empty token, and what do you think it
should mean?