[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: kerberos 4 problem
firstname.lastname@example.org (Johan Danielsson) writes:
> Well I don't know. The problem with this is that with this change you
> *always* get an ok looking principal, even if it doesn't exist. This
> isn't a problem for the KDC, since it has a list of possible
> principals to match against, but it is for other clients. Maybe the
> KDC should do this?
Yes, I think the KDC should do something to the same effect as this.