[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PKINIT support in which version?

To: "Douglas E. Engert" <deengert@anl.gov>
Subject: Re: PKINIT support in which version?
From: Love Hörnquist Åstrand <lha@kth.se>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:20:09 -0600
Cc: "Henry B. Hotz" <hotz@jpl.nasa.gov>, Heimdal-discuss list <heimdal-discuss@sics.se>, heimdal-bugs@pdc.kth.se
In-Reply-To: <441B11EB.3030806@anl.gov> (Douglas E. Engert's message of"Fri, 17 Mar 2006 13:45:47 -0600")
References: <F3488950-40EF-4460-B31A-FFFC4940E184@jpl.nasa.gov><441B11EB.3030806@anl.gov>
Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (darwin)


"Douglas E. Engert" <deengert@anl.gov> writes:

>> I'm assuming that the final draft-34 version of PKINIT isn't what's
>> supported in the latest released version of Heimdal, 0.7.2.
>> Are the daily snapshots good enough, or do I need some CVS variant
>> to  get the current PKINIT support?
>
> I was using the daily snapshots, to use the client with the W2K
> compatibility code.  I added CPPFLAGS="-DPKINIT"

You should use --enable-pk-init to configure instead. then you will be less
supprised in the future.

> I had been using a version from 2005/10/06. I downloaded
> snapshot/heimdal-20060306.tar.gz, and have been using it with one
> change to pkinit.c.  (I checked today's snapshot/heimdal-20060317.tar.gz
> and the pkinit.c is the same so this patch should also apply.)

Patch applied, thanks.

Love

PGP signature

References:
- PKINIT support in which version?
  - From: "Henry B. Hotz" <hotz@jpl.nasa.gov>
- Re: PKINIT support in which version?
  - From: "Douglas E. Engert" <deengert@anl.gov>

Prev by Date: Re: krb5_mk_req is returning some weird krb5 error.
Next by Date: Re: Enctype Problem
Prev by thread: Re: PKINIT support in which version?
Next by thread: zephyr
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread