[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: krb5_get_init_creds_opt_free()

To: "Kevin Coffman" <kwc@citi.umich.edu>
Subject: Re: krb5_get_init_creds_opt_free()
From: Love Hörnquist Åstrand <lha@kth.se>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 19:03:34 +0100
Cc: "Heimdal-discuss list" <heimdal-discuss@sics.se>, "krbdev@mit.edu" <krbdev@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4d569c330611200957m61e3d28fv3d21600eb5372492@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4d569c330611200957m61e3d28fv3d21600eb5372492@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se

Hi Kevin,

> Beside the fact that it isn't strictly needed, is there any reason not
> to supply a context to the krb5_get_init_creds_opt_free() function to
> make it consistent with the _alloc() function and other library
> functions?

Maybe it should, let make it so. Most of the _free functions takes a  
context
in Heimdal, but not all.

Love

References:
- krb5_get_init_creds_opt_free()
  - From: "Kevin Coffman" <kwc@citi.umich.edu>

Prev by Date: krb5_get_init_creds_opt_free()
Next by Date: Re: About one unknown padata type 129
Prev by thread: krb5_get_init_creds_opt_free()
Next by thread: $B%a%C%;!<%8$,FO$$$F$*$j$^$9(B
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread