[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 0.1g kadmind vs. large "list" commands?

To: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <allbery@kf8nh.apk.net>
Subject: Re: 0.1g kadmind vs. large "list" commands?
From: joda@pdc.kth.se (Johan Danielsson)
Date: 10 Jun 1999 17:29:55 -0700
Cc: heimdal-discuss@sics.se
In-Reply-To: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH"'s message of "Thu, 10 Jun 1999 19:33:13 -0400"
References: <199906102333.TAA07287@rushlight.kf8nh.apk.net>
Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070083 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.83) Emacs/20.3

"Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <allbery@kf8nh.apk.net> writes:

> Is there a limit to the number of principals that "list" can deal with?

It uses a fixed buffer to transmit data, so if the data is larger than
that you loose. I think it's been fixed.

/Johan

References:
- 0.1g kadmind vs. large "list" commands?
  - From: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <allbery@kf8nh.apk.net>

Prev by Date: 0.1g kadmind vs. large "list" commands?
Next by Date: heimdal-discuss archive
Prev by thread: 0.1g kadmind vs. large "list" commands?
Next by thread: Re: 0.1g kadmind vs. large "list" commands?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread