[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Heimdal 0.2m
Mark Murray <email@example.com> writes:
> That would be nice - I really don't like the way that libdes is
> diverting from the "mainstream" code; it is getting harder to
> maintain. FreeBSD's libdes (which I insist on using :-) ) cannot
> have these extras, so I have to stash them somewhere else.
The main reason for that was the lack of any active maintainer of
libdes. Putting our hash functions there was a mistake.
> Perfect solution ;-), as long as this is submitted back to the
> openssl folks and not maintained as a private (diverting) branch
> of your (or anyone else's) code...
Right. The idea is to submit it to them and leave the maintaince
of that to them. (If I were to have my own openssl-tree it's build
system would go under and be autoconfiscated...)