[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Memory cache updates for Heimdal 0.2t

To: heimdal-discuss@sics.se
Subject: Re: Memory cache updates for Heimdal 0.2t
From: Brian May <bmay@csse.monash.edu.au>
Date: 26 Jun 2000 11:05:32 +1000
In-Reply-To: Assar Westerlund's message of "Wed, 21 Jun 2000 03:33:36 +0200"
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1000527181534.16271B-100000@valerie.inf.elte.hu><xofpuq76lap.fsf@blubb.pdc.kth.se><x3r66r398ra.fsf@lyell.csse.monash.edu.au><5lg0q76cnj.fsf@assaris.sics.se>
Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0805 (Gnus v5.8.5) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald)

>>>>> "Assar" == Assar Westerlund <assar@sics.se> writes:

    Assar> But then you would need to store the ccache in shared
    Assar> memory which I believe that Gombas's patch does not?

Now, I am confused. If it doesn't use shared memory, what does it use?
What is the point of putting the ccache in non-shared memory?
-- 
Brian May <bmay@csse.monash.edu.au>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Memory cache updates for Heimdal 0.2t
  - From: Assar Westerlund <assar@sics.se>

References:
- Re: Memory cache updates for Heimdal 0.2t
  - From: Brian May <bmay@csse.monash.edu.au>
- Re: Memory cache updates for Heimdal 0.2t
  - From: Assar Westerlund <assar@sics.se>

Prev by Date: Re: multiple krb5 salted des keys
Next by Date: Re: Memory cache updates for Heimdal 0.2t
Prev by thread: Re: Memory cache updates for Heimdal 0.2t
Next by thread: Re: Memory cache updates for Heimdal 0.2t
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread