[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: rd_priv timestamp checking and kpasswdd

Derrick J Brashear <shadow@dementia.org> writes:

> I mean they are NULL, e.g. not *part.timestamp is 0, but
> part.timestamp = 0.

Ok.  We set that flag unconditionally in auth_con_init.

What is the correct thing to do here? Is it ok to accept messages
without a timestamp? Should it be configurable (apparently it has to