[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rd_priv timestamp checking and kpasswdd
On 9 Aug 2000, Johan Danielsson wrote:
> Derrick J Brashear <email@example.com> writes:
> > I mean they are NULL, e.g. not *part.timestamp is 0, but
> > part.timestamp = 0.
> Ok. We set that flag unconditionally in auth_con_init.
> What is the correct thing to do here? Is it ok to accept messages
> without a timestamp?
I'm not pleased about it, but I don't see what else I can do if the Win2k
dialog is going to work.
> Should it be configurable (apparently it has to be)?
I guess so; At the rd_priv level (libdefaults) or by specifying it for