Re: rd_priv timestamp checking and kpasswdd

[Assar Westerlund <assar@sics.se>]

Derrick J Brashear <shadow@dementia.org> writes:
> > What is the correct thing to do here? Is it ok to accept messages
> > without a timestamp? 
> 
> I'm not pleased about it, but I don't see what else I can do if the Win2k
> dialog is going to work.

It's unclear to me how the absence of timestamps should be treated.

> > Should it be configurable (apparently it has to be)?
> 
> I guess so; At the rd_priv level (libdefaults) or by specifying it for
> kpasswdd?

I would much prefer having it do the right thing in the kpasswdd code
and otherwise with a kpasswdd-specific configuration.

/assar