[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: kadmin bug (missing mod_name)

To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com>
Subject: Re: kadmin bug (missing mod_name)
From: joda@pdc.kth.se (Johan Danielsson)
Date: 09 Nov 2000 00:34:39 +0100
Cc: heimdal-discuss@sics.se
In-Reply-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine"'s message of "Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:30:35 -0600"
References: <20001108132509.A77854@hamlet.nectar.com> <20001108173035.B93989@spawn.nectar.com>
Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5

"Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> writes:

> The more serious problem is that `modifiersName' will never (?) be a
> krb5PrincipalName.  Rather it will be anonymous (if it was updated
> using kadmin), or something like `uid=nectar' or even
> `uid=nectar@NECTAR.COM' (if it was updated directly via LDAP).

So what should be done about this? I'm no LDAP expert. I guess the
people using it should have a say about this.

/Johan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: kadmin bug (missing mod_name)
  - From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com>

References:
- kadmin bug (missing mod_name)
  - From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com>
- Re: kadmin bug (missing mod_name)
  - From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com>

Prev by Date: Re: ftp: RFC 2228 (PROT) broken
Next by Date: Re: redhat kerberos PAM
Prev by thread: Re: kadmin bug (missing mod_name)
Next by thread: Re: kadmin bug (missing mod_name)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread