Re: resolution for gss_acquire_cred incompatibility?

[Assar Westerlund <assar@sics.se>]

Derrick J Brashear <shadow@dementia.org> writes:
> > The function name (gsskrb5_register_acceptor_identity) is confusing.
> > I guess there should be another one, but for now I was thinking of
> > doing something like this.  Comments?
> 
> Looks correct. Maybe there should be another one but the other guys have
> only one so if you change you'll be different, and that will be "big fun"

Ok, added.  I would leave gsskrb5_register_acceptor_identity doing the
same thing, but having a new one for setting the `acquire_identity' in
that case.  Fun, but backwards-compatible fun.

/assar