[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Incomplete documentation

To: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <allbery@ece.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Incomplete documentation
From: Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 09:54:26 +1000
Cc: heimdal-discuss@sics.se, Mikael Andersson <mikan@debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <1063907635.94449.20.camel@pyanfar.ece.cmu.edu>
References: <amr82ec89p.fsf@nutcracker.stacken.kth.se> <1063907635.94449.20.camel@pyanfar.ece.cmu.edu>
Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 01:53:55PM -0400, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 13:32, Love wrote:
> > yes, current heimdal requires openssl>=0.9.7, and there is not released
> > kth-krb4 that can handle that.
> 
> Gack.  So what are the chances of this being fixed, for those of us who
> still need krb4 compatibility?

The version of kth-krb4 in Debian has a patch that allows it to build
with openssl 0.9.7.
-- 
Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Incomplete documentation
  - From: Love <lha@stacken.kth.se>

References:
- Re: Incomplete documentation
  - From: Love <lha@stacken.kth.se>
- Re: Incomplete documentation
  - From: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <allbery@ece.cmu.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Incomplete documentation
Next by Date: Re: Heimdal versus Krb4 versus AFS
Prev by thread: Re: Incomplete documentation
Next by thread: Re: Incomplete documentation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread