[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: heimdal on tru64 unix peculiarities
- To: David Komanek <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: heimdal on tru64 unix peculiarities
- From: Dave Love <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 15:37:37 +0100
- Cc: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.email@example.com> (DavidKomanek's message of "Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:53:36 +0200 (CEST)")
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org><Pine.OSF.email@example.com>
- Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org
- User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux)
David Komanek <email@example.com> writes:
> 1. using heimdal as OSF SIA modules produces ticket files which are never
> removed from the temp directory after the user is successfully logged in -
> what is the workaround for this except rm-ing thousands of files every
> hour ?
When I tried a long time ago, I couldn't get the Heimdal SIA module to
work. I've been using the one at
against MIT. I never got round to trying to make it work with
Heimdal. I can't get both Kerberos and LDAP working properly under
> 2. heimdal seems to be much slower than kth-krb ver. 4. Does anyone have
> any experience with tuning heimdal ?
Heimdal kinit is effectively instant for me on T64 5.1B, and I don't
remember obvious slowness on earlier T64 versions.
> For example for kinit, truss shows
> the delay i scaused by about 64 subsequently trapped signals of value 14.
> Could it be related to random generator, which is not present as
> special device on the tru64 unix and is searched before and after this
> signal burst ?
For what it's worth, 5.1B has /dev/random and /dev/urandom.