[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Mechanism extensions and the GSSAPI

To: Love <lha@stacken.kth.se>
Subject: Re: Mechanism extensions and the GSSAPI
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 15:09:14 -0400
Cc: krbdev@mit.edu, heimdal-discuss@sics.se, lukeh@PADL.COM
In-Reply-To: <am4qqxqqrc.fsf@nutcracker.stacken.kth.se> (lha@stacken.kth.se'smessage of "Mon, 03 May 2004 21:01:27 +0200")
References: <20040428201406.02F2D151D5C@konishi-polis.mit.edu><ampt9pswov.fsf@nutcracker.stacken.kth.se><20040430141457.GI22519@binky.central.sun.com><tslwu3tigb2.fsf@konishi-polis.mit.edu><am4qqxqqrc.fsf@nutcracker.stacken.kth.se>
Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux)

>>>>> "Love" == Love  <lha@stacken.kth.se> writes:

    Love> Sam, you want to make the remove the possibility that
    Love> gssapi's ABI independant of the implementation ?

GSSAPI does not specify an ABI.  But I don't understand your message.

References:
- Re: Mechanism extensions and the GSSAPI
  - From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>
- Re: Mechanism extensions and the GSSAPI
  - From: Love <lha@stacken.kth.se>

Prev by Date: Re: Mechanism extensions and the GSSAPI
Next by Date: Re: Login prompt when starting services after FreeBSD port install
Prev by thread: Re: Mechanism extensions and the GSSAPI
Next by thread: Re: Mechanism extensions and the GSSAPI
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread