[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: OpenLDAP / SASL / Heimdal

To: sam <samwun@hgcbroadband.com>
Subject: Re: OpenLDAP / SASL / Heimdal
From: Love <lha@stacken.kth.se>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 15:36:04 +0200
Cc: Andreas Haupt <andreas.haupt@hmi.de>, heimdal-discuss@sics.se
In-Reply-To: <40C46CC4.5050803@hgcbroadband.com> (samwun@hgcbroadband.com'smessage of "Mon, 07 Jun 2004 21:25:24 +0800")
References: <200406071242.01432.andreas.haupt@hmi.de><am4qpnmsh2.fsf@nutcracker.stacken.kth.se><40C46CC4.5050803@hgcbroadband.com>
Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)


sam <samwun@hgcbroadband.com> writes:

> I dont' know if it is good idea to use 0.6.2, becuase it might have
> changed the encryption method which is different from 0.6. I had a
> nightmare after upgraded to 0.6.2 which caused the connection request
> fail because incompatible encryption key or something like that....

There are quite a lot of security fixes between 0.6 and 0.6.2.

What problems did you get ?

Love

PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: OpenLDAP / SASL / Heimdal
  - From: sam <samwun@hgcbroadband.com>

References:
- OpenLDAP / SASL / Heimdal
  - From: Andreas Haupt <andreas.haupt@hmi.de>
- Re: OpenLDAP / SASL / Heimdal
  - From: Love <lha@stacken.kth.se>
- Re: OpenLDAP / SASL / Heimdal
  - From: sam <samwun@hgcbroadband.com>

Prev by Date: Re: OpenLDAP / SASL / Heimdal
Next by Date: Re: OpenLDAP / SASL / Heimdal
Prev by thread: Re: OpenLDAP / SASL / Heimdal
Next by thread: Re: OpenLDAP / SASL / Heimdal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread