[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Smbk5pwd and Heimdal 0.7 not playing nice?
Perry Nguyen wrote:
>> From: firstname.lastname@example.org
>> [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of Love
>> Hörnquist Åstrand
>> Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 12:19 AM
>> To: Perry Nguyen
>> Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
>> Subject: Re: Smbk5pwd and Heimdal 0.7 not playing nice?
>> The api changed because one of the element was named
>> ->close() and that
>> collided with system close rewrite to support largefile. Instead of
>> renameing one element, I renamed them all.
> When did this name change occur, and why hasn't smbk5pwd been updated to
> support this change? It seems like smbk5pwd has been a recent development
> (perhaps I should ask on the openldap list, since it's "their" module). The
> name change must have happened a long time ago?
smbk5pwd was written April 2004, using the Heimdal 0.5 code. I have
never used it with Heimdal 0.7. You should file a report with the
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc
OpenLDAP Core Team http://www.openldap.org/project/