Re: Smbk5pwd and Heimdal 0.7 not playing nice?

[Howard Chu <hyc@highlandsun.com>]

Perry Nguyen wrote:
>> From: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se 
>> [mailto:owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se] On Behalf Of Love 
>> Hörnquist Åstrand
>> Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 12:19 AM
>> To: Perry Nguyen
>> Cc: heimdal-discuss@sics.se
>> Subject: Re: Smbk5pwd and Heimdal 0.7 not playing nice?
> 
>> The api changed because one of the element was named 
>> ->close() and that
>> collided with system close rewrite to support largefile. Instead of
>> renameing one element, I renamed them all.
> 
> When did this name change occur, and why hasn't smbk5pwd been updated to
> support this change?  It seems like smbk5pwd has been a recent development
> (perhaps I should ask on the openldap list, since it's "their" module).  The
> name change must have happened a long time ago?

smbk5pwd was written April 2004, using the Heimdal 0.5 code. I have 
never used it with Heimdal 0.7. You should file a report with the 
OpenLDAP ITS.

-- 
   -- Howard Chu
   Chief Architect, Symas Corp.  http://www.symas.com
   Director, Highland Sun        http://highlandsun.com/hyc
   OpenLDAP Core Team            http://www.openldap.org/project/