[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: About one unknown padata type 129

16 nov 2006 kl. 06.10 skrev Ralph:

> What's the meaning of 'not compatible'? Do you mean Heimdal has
> already know the structure of this piece of data (padata 129)? Or,
> does Heimdal use another approach to prived Constrained Delegation and
> Protocol Transition?

There is a diffrent wireformat today since I don't know what the  
format was.
Also note that since there is no PAC in Heimdal, there needs to be a  
solution for checking the validity of the request.

See the end of tests/kdc/check-kdc.in how to use it.