[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MEMORY credential cache interop between Heimdal and MIT?
Going back to the original question (per-process credentials store
shared between MIT and Heimdal), after some off-list discussion with
Jeff, I looked around a little...
Both MIT and Heimdal have routines for registering new credential
cache types, although for the MIT interface you have to include some
private headers. The interfaces are fairly similar, though type
definitions differ. One could create shared objects which have in-
memory cache implementations compatible with each Kerberos
implementation, and register them with each, but use shared data in
the back end. Might be a bit tedious and ugly, but should be doable....