[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Partial Slave KDC

To: heimdal-discuss@sics.se, Mihail Krivushin <mkrivushin@souzt.com>
Subject: Re: Partial Slave KDC
From: mkondrin <mkondrin@hppi.troitsk.ru>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:49:21 +0400
In-Reply-To: <200804221159.09308.mkrivushin@souzt.com>
List-Archive: <http://list.sics.se/sympa/arc/heimdal-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa@sics.se?subject=help>
List-Id: <heimdal-discuss.sics.se>
List-Owner: <mailto:heimdal-discuss-request@sics.se>
List-Post: <mailto:heimdal-discuss@sics.se>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:sympa@sics.se?subject=subscribe%20heimdal-discuss>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sympa@sics.se?subject=unsubscribe%20heimdal-discuss>
References: <200804221159.09308.mkrivushin@souzt.com>
Reply-To: heimdal-discuss@sics.se, mkondrin <mkondrin@hppi.troitsk.ru>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060909)

Mihail Krivushin wrote:
> What do you think about subject? In star topology, with bad net links, slave 
> KDC in foreign departments is required. But I don't want to take full view to 
> slave.
> Have developers any plans about such functionality?
>
>   
Why not simply install full KDC for that department and join it to KDC 
responsible for whole organization with trust (bi- or one-directional)? 
Isn't it functionally the same?

M.Kondrin

References:
- Partial Slave KDC
  - From: Mihail Krivushin <mkrivushin@souzt.com>

Prev by Date: Partial Slave KDC
Next by Date: kadmin -p problem
Prev by thread: Partial Slave KDC
Next by thread: Re: Partial Slave KDC
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread