[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Partial Slave KDC

To: heimdal-discuss@sics.se, Mihail Krivushin <mkrivushin@souzt.com>
Subject: Re: Partial Slave KDC
From: Love Hörnquist Åstrand <lha@kth.se>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:03:36 +0200
In-Reply-To: <200804221159.09308.mkrivushin@souzt.com>
List-Archive: <http://list.sics.se/sympa/arc/heimdal-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa@sics.se?subject=help>
List-Id: <heimdal-discuss.sics.se>
List-Owner: <mailto:heimdal-discuss-request@sics.se>
List-Post: <mailto:heimdal-discuss@sics.se>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:sympa@sics.se?subject=subscribe%20heimdal-discuss>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sympa@sics.se?subject=unsubscribe%20heimdal-discuss>
References: <200804221159.09308.mkrivushin@souzt.com>
Reply-To: heimdal-discuss@sics.se, Love Hörnquist Åstrand <lha@kth.se>


22 apr 2008 kl. 06.59 skrev Mihail Krivushin:

> What do you think about subject? In star topology, with bad net  
> links, slave
> KDC in foreign departments is required. But I don't want to take  
> full view to
> slave.
> Have developers any plans about such functionality?

If they dont belong the same realm this is triveal to do.

However, I would first try incremental propagation and have a full  
slave at the remote site.

Heimdal doesn't support the concept of sites that microsoft AD does,  
maybe we should to inprove the client performance.

Love

References:
- Partial Slave KDC
  - From: Mihail Krivushin <mkrivushin@souzt.com>

Prev by Date: Re: kadmind.acl
Next by Date: ipropd-master error message
Prev by thread: Re: Partial Slave KDC
Next by thread: kadmin -p problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread