On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 17:33 -0700, Henry B. Hotz wrote: > Do you propose to use something other than the usual 1 second > timeout? If so, why? > > If you are using Krb5 over TCP, isn't there a timeout associated with > TCP that you should use instead? I just want to continue to use the same timeout as the krb5 lib normally would, whatever that is. We can hard-code it (such as in the patch below to 10 seconds), but I wanted to try and do it properly first... Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
This is a digitally signed message part