[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Memory cache updates for Heimdal 0.2t
On 26 Jun 2000, Assar Westerlund wrote:
> Now, having several of these, I'm not quite sure I see when it would
> be useful.
The story is: I begun playing with a PAM module written for MIT Kerberos.
It used named memory caches which Heimdal did not support, so I
implemented it. As I remember the docs say Heimdal aims to "be reasonably
compatible with the M.I.T Kerberos V5 API". So the question is: is this
functionality part of the "reasonable" thing or not. If not, drop it (but
the fixes for not freeing the krb5_cc_ops structure when the krb5_context
goes away are still needed).
Gabor Gombas Eotvos Lorand University
E-mail: email@example.com Hungary