[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: inetd.conf.changes

To: Peter Ehlin <pelin@voxi.se>
Subject: Re: inetd.conf.changes
From: joda@pdc.kth.se (Johan Danielsson)
Date: 12 Sep 2000 13:55:08 +0200
Cc: heimdal-discuss@sics.se
In-Reply-To: Peter Ehlin's message of "Tue, 12 Sep 2000 10:31:17 +0200"
References: <39BDE9D5.C36C7CA@voxi.se>
Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5

Peter Ehlin <pelin@voxi.se> writes:

> This is what I have been able to figure out:

Looks ok.

> Is this correct?

Looks ok.

> Do I need kf normally??

Not really.

> Does it become encrypted anyway? I'm confused...

V5 rsh can negotiate about encryption, whereas V4 rsh can't, so you
have to tell it explicitly by using a different port.

> Also, the usage output above fails to explain the option "-L".

That's because it isn't implemented.

/Johan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: inetd.conf.changes
  - From: joda@pdc.kth.se (Johan Danielsson)
- Re: inetd.conf.changes
  - From: Peter Ehlin <pelin@voxi.se>

References:
- inetd.conf.changes
  - From: Peter Ehlin <pelin@voxi.se>

Prev by Date: inetd.conf.changes
Next by Date: Re: inetd.conf.changes
Prev by thread: inetd.conf.changes
Next by thread: Re: inetd.conf.changes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread