[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: inetd.conf.changes

Peter Ehlin <pelin@voxi.se> writes:

> This is what I have been able to figure out:

Looks ok.

> Is this correct?

Looks ok.

> Do I need kf normally??

Not really.

> Does it become encrypted anyway? I'm confused...

V5 rsh can negotiate about encryption, whereas V4 rsh can't, so you
have to tell it explicitly by using a different port.

> Also, the usage output above fails to explain the option "-L".

That's because it isn't implemented.