Re: inetd.conf.changes

[Peter Ehlin <pelin@voxi.se>]

Johan Danielsson wrote:
> 
> Peter Ehlin <pelin@voxi.se> writes:
> > Does it become encrypted anyway? I'm confused...
> 
> V5 rsh can negotiate about encryption, whereas V4 rsh can't, so you
> have to tell it explicitly by using a different port.

So, what should be in my /etc/inetd.conf if I want to have something
like the old ekshell (encryption and authetication) and disallow the
unencrypted rsh variants? 

/Peter