[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Failure Rate for Heimdal SW?

To: "Henry B. Hotz" <hotz@jpl.nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: Failure Rate for Heimdal SW?
From: Johan Danielsson <joda@pdc.kth.se>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 14:52:42 +0200
Cc: heimdal-discuss@sics.se
In-Reply-To: <67F9D2D8-ECC0-11D8-A6F6-000A95CA746C@jpl.nasa.gov> (Henry B.Hotz's message of "Thu, 12 Aug 2004 17:33:32 -0700")
References: <67F9D2D8-ECC0-11D8-A6F6-000A95CA746C@jpl.nasa.gov>
Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/20.7 (berkeley-unix)

"Henry B. Hotz" <hotz@jpl.nasa.gov> writes:

> Anybody got any "software failures" which are remotely statistical in
> nature?  Any ideas on how to assign an availability number to the
> software component?  Any failures that require/cause a Kerberos
> restart?

Not really. I can't recall it ever being totally off-line that was not
caused by other problems (power outages, network ebola, etc).

/Johan

References:
- Failure Rate for Heimdal SW?
  - From: "Henry B. Hotz" <hotz@jpl.nasa.gov>

Prev by Date: Re: Failure Rate for Heimdal SW?
Next by Date: Re: Failure Rate for Heimdal SW?
Prev by thread: Re: Failure Rate for Heimdal SW?
Next by thread: Subscriber:sleeping disor,der makes me really tired and weary
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread