[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?

To: heimdal-discuss@sics.se
Subject: Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
From: Tarjei Huse <tarjei@nu.no>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 16:37:51 +0200
In-Reply-To: <1120655557.9219.1.camel@localhost>
References: <1120612841.6159.119.camel@amy.samba4.abartlet.net> <sa4mzp0zhqd.fsf@snoopy.microcomaustralia.com.au> <42CB78CA.9000604@kzsdabas.sulinet.hu> <1120655557.9219.1.camel@localhost>
Reply-To: tarjei@nu.no
Sender: owner-heimdal-discuss@sics.se

Hi,
> > The biggest issue is with the fact that few clients are able of using it 
> > (Evolution claims support
> 
> Evolution's GSSAPI support works.
Has anyone looked at the Thunderbird code? I'm just wondering how hard
it would be to add kerberos support and a writeable ldapadressbook to
TB.

Regards, tarjei
> 
-- 
Tarjei Huse <tarjei@nu.no>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
  - From: "Stefan (metze) Metzmacher" <metze@samba.org>

References:
- Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
  - From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
- Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
  - From: Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>
- Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
  - From: Gémes Géza <geza@kzsdabas.sulinet.hu>
- Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
  - From: Adam Tauno Williams <adam@morrison-ind.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
Next by Date: Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
Prev by thread: Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
Next by thread: Re: Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread