[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ultra-modern autootols toolchain (autoconf > 2.61, automake >1.10) required?

On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 13:05 +1000, Brian May wrote:
> Buchan Milne wrote:
> > Is there a reason for r this requirement, or is it just what it was tested 
> > with?
> >   
> For Debian, I had problems using anything other then the latest of 
> everything, even after updating the configure.in requirements. Most 
> notable, libtool was broken; it set $echo early on but tried to use 
> $ECHO. Or vice versa. Every $ECHO statement tried to execute the message 
> instead (because $ECHO was empty), which didn't work too well.
> I just wanted something to work, so I didn't investigate into any more 
> depth. I am not entirely convinced this is a Heimdal issue either, but I 
> wasn't sure what else could have suddenly caused this issue to occur.

I grabbed libtool 2.2 and autoconf 2.62 from debian experimental before
it would work.

Andrew Bartlett

Andrew Bartlett
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.

This is a digitally signed message part