[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Mechanism extensions and the GSSAPI

>>>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com> writes:

    Nicolas> On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 04:05:38PM -0400, Sam Hartman
    Nicolas> wrote:
    >> >>>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>
    >> writes:
    Nicolas> But are you suggesting that the shim-to-ioctl part not be
    Nicolas> specified?
    >>  I think doing so will be a lot of work and I think that a
    >> compelling value case with specific examples would need to be
    >> made before I'd agree this is a valuable use of our time.

    Nicolas> In that case we'll just have to wait, period.  At least
    Nicolas> until after the 60th IETF, where we'll be busy with
    Nicolas> KITTEN BoF stuff anyhow.

I'm not sure that time frame is acceptable to Kevin.

I suspect we'll need to decide on a solution relatively soon.

So I think at least for the MIT implementation the oid vs non-oid
question will already be settled by then.