[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Mechanism extensions and the GSSAPI

Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu> writes:

> So I think at least for the MIT implementation the oid vs non-oid
> question will already be settled by then.

I consider the ioctl + skim with implemetion specific ioctl layer mostly
useless. It will make force application developers to deal with an
exploding API.

ioctl with propper namespace is a requirement for me, oid gives me that
namespace, BTW the real the ioctl somewhat have today.


PGP signature