[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mechanism extensions and the GSSAPI
>>>>> "Love" == Love <email@example.com> writes:
Love> Sam Hartman <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> So I think at least for the MIT implementation the oid vs
>> non-oid question will already be settled by then.
Love> I consider the ioctl + skim with implemetion specific ioctl
Love> layer mostly useless. It will make force application
Love> developers to deal with an exploding API.
I consider an exploding API desirable. Well it is more like I want
application authors to be able to call APIs for the extensions they
I'll drop heimdal-discuss from
future posts as it seems we have incompatible goals.