[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [patch] miscellaneous mechglue stuff
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 19:26:02 +0200
Andrew Bartlett <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I'm lost. Why do we need to add extra flags? For the checksum at
> least, I thought the not-8003 was just a defect we needed to be
> compatible with (due to samba3 and similar designs). What am I missing?
Ahh, I think you're right. At least sending an 8005 checksum to W2K3
server works. I would be curious to know if Windows clients send the MD5
checksum though. If not, then you're right, we don't need the checksum
The change to *accept* MD5 should still be applied of course.
> On SPNEGO, can't you just tell because there was no input token, and you
> are on the server side, that you are in the special case?
Sending a NegTokenInit without an optimistic mechToken is the problem.